Articles


Currently, PGAV is working with several zoos to master plan for the coming years.  One of our current clients is the Kansas City Zoo.  We’ve been working with them for several years now, helping them with the new entrance and the polar bear exhibit.

Master plan board at public night. (KCZooFan via Flickr)

Kansas City Zoo’s number one problem is its size.  The Zoo, which is easily one of the largest in the U.S., is spread across 200 acres, requiring guests to spend a majority of their visit simply walking from one attraction to another.  In a long term effort to curb this, the Zoo has already started bringing animals to the front of the zoo.  Beyond that, the new master plan intends to create concentrated zones of exhibits where guests can easily take in all of the experiences and feel they’ve accomplished something for the day, while leaving unvisited areas for another day.  This approach is something that other zoos should consider as most zoos are local attractions–most guests come from nearby and they come several times a year.

For some reason, this master plan has been receiving a lot of press.  Below are a few links for additional information:

“Master plan for Kansas City Zoo calls for ‘mini-zoos,’ more attractions and entertainment.” Associated Press

“KC Zoo considers blueprint for the future: three zoos in one.” Kansas City Star

For more master plan images, click here.

Some designers begin with a poem.  Others look at the educational message.  Still others envision a place.  I always start with the animal.

When I start my design process with the animal, I don’t literally mean that I sit down with Google (or even–do you remember this–flipping through books!) spending  hours researching the animal’s natural history.  What I mean is that I immediately register what I know about that animal and have that inform all aspects of design.  Of course, I’ve been doing this for a while and I have quite a bit of animal trivia logged away in my own dusty library of grey matter.

But, really, what is it that informs design?  What information about an animal is truly useful in creating its surroundings?  The subject of animal behavior is a nearly unending panacea of amazing stories, but determining what facts help inform design can be an overwhelming question.

For fun, below is my absolute favorite (and quintessential) animal behavior example.

To help you navigate the masses of information available about specific animals, I’ve condensed the vast subject of animal behavior into six basic categories relevant to zoo designers.

1. Food Acquisition:  Are they carnivores, omnivores, or herbivores?

2. Social Structure:  Do they live in groups, pairs, or singly?

3. Time of Activity: Are they nocturnal, diurnal, or crepuscular (active at dawn and dusk)?

4. Micro-Habitat: Do they live primarily in trees (arboreal), on land (terrestrial), in water (aquatic), or some combination of any or all of the three?

5. Personality: Are they shy, curious, skittish, indifferent, vicious?

6. Reproduction: Does their reproductive strategy require any particular element in their physical environment?

Pop-up at Jungala, Busch Gardens

Each of the above will provide insight into the physical surroundings that will best house an animal in captivity.  For example, carnivores tend to exert energy in bursts, spending the rest of the day sleeping.  They also tend to prefer the high vantage points where they can scan the horizon and smell the air.  Knowing this, we’d immediately suggest providing this carnivore with several high points in their exhibit, preferably where they can be in close proximity to the guest as they sleep.  Jungala at Busch Gardens achieves this well with their tiger pop-up–highest point of the exhibit is actually a viewing window!

Another great example is the amazing bower bird.  We could easily create just another generic aviary with a gravel floor or concrete basin.  But understanding their reproductive behavior would allow us to create an environment whereby they are able to create their own habitat.  {Or, more than that, we could re-create one of their creations on the guest side of things in order to illustrate their great ability.}

Beyond these basics, understanding animal behavior encourages us to strive for ever-more enriching environments.  To design an enrichment device, or simply to provide a habitat that provides the most basic form of enrichment–choice, requires that you understand the natural history of an animal.

Oftentimes designers who do not have a specialization in animals, jump immediately to the guest experience; creating a place or a story for the visitor.  But, we must understand that a good guest experience at a zoological park revolves around the ANIMAL, not the setting we create.  People come to the park to see animals.  And if the animals look unhealthy or unhappy, the most beautiful ancient Mayan ruins won’t save the experience.  Look to the animals first.  Be inspired by their lives before creating a story, and you’ll see that your final product will be by far the best experience possible for both guests and the animals living there.

Every animal has a story.  Its our job to tell it.

Resources:

“Integrating Animal Behavior and Exhibit Design” by John Seidensticker and James Doherty

“Part Five: Behavior” from Wild Mammals in Captivity

Last week, the PGAV Zoo Design Specialty Development Team met to discuss enrichment.  As prep for this discussion, we read a few short articles, including this one from Jon Coe.  In it, he asserts that the purpose of enrichment is to provide animals with Competence, Choice and Collaboration.

Competence, according to Coe, is the ability to perform natural behaviors at a level that which, if when returned to the wild, the animal would be able to sustain itself.

Choice is the basic fundamental of enrichment, in my eyes.  Just like us, animals in captivity are happier when  able to assert some level of control over their lives.  Providing animals with choices, like micro-climate or socio-behavioral options, as well as more advanced choices, like problem solving, will enhance their lives incalculably.

And finally, we arrive at Collaboration.  This concept was something I hadn’t really considered until reading Coe’s article, but the idea is fairly straight-forward.  Some enrichment allows a relationship between keeper and animal that would not otherwise occur; the keeper and animal work together, or the animal relies on the trainer in order to achieve something.  Training as enrichment is the obvious example here.

I mention all of this because of a video clip one of the SDT members shared with us last week.  Beyond being absolutely mind-blowing (but also, not really!), it truly supported the idea of Collaborative enrichment AND Choice.  Fast forward to 7:45.

Enjoy!

http://www-tc.pbs.org/video/media/swf/PBSPlayer.swf

Watch the full episode. See more NOVA scienceNOW.

People are always floored when they learn what I do for a living.  I don’t blame them.  It’s not like high school guidance counselors are pushing kids to become zoo designers or aquarium architects.  There are no high-profile television shows about zoo designers, no yearly review of the best zoo design schools at the best price.

Where's the best school for Zoo Design?

Ultimately, this lack of awareness about our field brings questions.  And one that is always, guaranteed to come up is ‘where did you learn to do this?’  When I describe  my homemade educational program achieved through determination, passion and a plucky ingenuity,  indelibly, my listener almost always appears disappointed with my answer.

So, in an effort to reduce the looks of disappointment that my fellow zoo designers must endure, I’ve introduced a new educational, career development program within PGAV.  This program is called the “Specialty Development Group (SDT).”

At PGAV, we have many specialists: ride designers, green designers, interpretive & storyline developers, resort designers, among others.  And most of these specialists learned their trade through their own plucky ingenuity and years of experience.  But, we have many young people at PGAV as well.  People who have a passion for destinations like theme parks, aquariums and zoos, but who may not have had the chance to pursue a specialty in school due to strict program requirements.

In an effort to fully develop these young designers, we’ve decided to actively teach them, rather than hope they pick up the nuances of these specialties through on the job training.  The Zoo Design SDT which I lead is the pilot program.  We have a small group of three trainees, myself as leader, and a VP, who has over 20 years of experience in the animal exhibitry field.

We meet once a month for about an hour.  In this time, we discuss any news that we’ve found interesting over the last month, including project news or world zoo / aquarium happenings.  We usually have one person give a quick site visit presentation (they are required to visit 3 zoos or aquariums over the yearlong course), then delve into the monthly discussion or lecture.

The monthly topics are pre-determined via syllabus and have been chosen and arranged to allow a logical flow from general zoo design philosophy into specifics, like LSS design and enrichment.  This portion of the program is very much like a class, with required readings, in-meeting activities, discussions, formal lectures and guest speakers.

Beyond these meetings, we go on field trips together, and we create a monthly Animal of the Month info sheet to be shared with the entire PGAV office.  These sheets cover everything from the basics (animal size, conservation status, behavior, social structure) to husbandry requirements and recommendations to the world’s best exhibits.

Jin Hee and I on a tour of PGAV's Glacier Run with Louisville Zoo director, John Walczak.

The participants are also required to write two papers during the year.  The first, a simple white paper, is open to any topic of interest to the participant, limited only to the subject of zoo or aquarium design.  The second, and final project, is a paper addressing the future of zoo design–a topic of great interest to everyone in zoo design.

Of particular note, the SDT is not supposed to function as a class.  Everyone attending the meetings must partake in the activities and homework.  So, as leader, not only do I create the lesson plan and lectures, but I also do research for the Animal of the Month info sheets, write papers, and present on site visits.  In this way, not only do the newbies learn, but the experienced zoo designers continue to learn as well.

Personally, I’ve found the SDT has renewed my passion and required me to not site idly by, as is so easy to do as a professional.  This type of professional development requires me to evaluate day to day work, to think more deeply about philosophy and ethics and about the long-term implications of everything we do as designers.

Even more, I’m so proud of our participants who, despite a very taxing workload, are able to attend meetings regularly, excitedly share experiences, and think critically about the topics we discuss.

I’m very proud to be leading the charge to help educate our future zoo design leaders and hope other professionals at zoo design firms  take advantage of our experiences with this issue.

If you are interested in our program description or syllabus, please email me directly.  I’m glad to share!

From Albuquerque, NM:

 

 

From Reuters:

“Zoos Lack Funds to Inspire Obama’s Future Scientists

 

From Wildlife Conservation Society, New York:

Amidst the worldwide economic crisis, Dubai’s exponential construction and growth has come to a screeching halt.  Countless numbers of projects have been put on hold, until costcutting measures can be instated, or until the lending market (on which Dubai solely relies for its development capital) thaws.

Typical Path at Dubai Zoo

Typical Path at Dubai Zoo

Among these projects is the desperately bad, 5 acre  Dubai Zoo.  Built in the 1960s in the area referred to now as “Old Dubai”, the Zoo has a long history of re-designs, master plans, and promises unkept, but this was to be the one that worked. 

The city has been building to its master plan, progressing to the goal of a vast metropolitan area comparable to the world’s greats.  Pockets of developments can be seen across the desert; a strange world of clusters of towering skyscrapers dotting a sea of sand, connected by the widest highway you’ll ever see.  These pockets are the early developments of the metro’s “cities”, similar to NYC’s burroughs.  Among the cities, Sports City, Industrial City, Waterfront City, and Dubailand. 

Cold Climate Bear Surviving the Scorching Dubai Heat

Cold Climate Bear Surviving the Scorching Dubai Heat

Dubailand was to be the new home for the Dubai Zoo.  Dubailand, currently under construction and halted, was to be an entertainment haven, offering a variety of theme parks, malls, and, of course, the new Zoo. 

Poor Conditions at Dubai Zoo

Poor Conditions at Dubai Zoo

Trying to Keep Animals Cool as Best They Can

Trying to Keep Animals Cool as Best They Can

Details on the new zoo vary widely, but it appears to be approximately 200 acres and will include the zoo, a night safari, resort style accommodations, and education facilities. 

Current Plan for Zoo??

Current Plan for Zoo??

However, it remains to be seen if this relocation will actually occur, or will this just be another in a long line of unkept promises.

Read all about it here.

Aerial Rendering of Proposed Zoo

Aerial Rendering of Proposed Zoo

dubai-zoo-entry-rendering

Rendering of New Zoo's Entry

kczoo-horizontalKansas City Zoo has been workly lately to give itself  a face-lift.  The Zoo, considered by locals to be the “red-headed step kid” to the world-famous St. Louis Zoo (a mere 3 hours’ drive away), has seen less and less support in recent decades.  To counter this, the Zoo has set about new construction and renovations projects throughout the facilty. 

Rendered Aerial View of New Entry

Rendered Aerial View of New Entry

On the heels of the recently re-opened front entry plaza, including streamlined ticketing, parking, and otters as soon as you walk in, the Zoo is currently working on a renovation of its historic 1909 building.  This building, which started its life as the sole animal habitat for the Zoo, has been through several iterations, most recently as an education building. 

Otters in Their New Home

Otters in Their New Home

Now, however, construction is reclaiming its primary use, and inside the building a rainforest exhibit is being created.  Tropical plants are being flown in from Florida to make as realistic a home as possible for the monkey species, anteaters, tropical birds, and capybara which will call this place home.

The relatively small budget of $5.1 million will allow for nearly 8000 square feet of exhibit space and 5000 square feet of support.  The highlight of the exhibit is a glass enclosed bridge through the trees, where guests should be able to view monkeys playing in the branches, up close.

Rainforest Pool Under Construction

Rainforest Pool Under Construction

This exhibit is due to open in May, coinciding with the Zoo’s Centennial celebration.  Other upcoming plans include new homes for polar bears and penguins.

Little Rock Zoo, a measly 33 acres and bounded by urban land, recently lost its most viable option for expansion when the city decided to donate an empty stadium and its lot, not to the zoo as expected, but to the hospital.

little_rock_zoo-logo

Click HERE for video coverage

Little Rock Zoo is one of the few zoos in the country keeping elephants in their collections.  The land was to be used by the Zoo as an expansion to their current exhibit, in an effort to meet AZA requirements for keeping elephants. 

The requirements state that institutions holding elephants must keep at least three females in a group, and are recommending institutions have the ability to be used for breeding.  This means the Zoo would have to increase its size for at least one additional animal, as they currently have two females, and, if following the breeding route, would have to add space for at least one male.  All of this would also include increasing the safety and security of the current exhibit to bring it up to standards for housing bull elephants.  The Zoo estimated, rather loosely, that this project would cost between $10 and 20 million. 

One of the Zoo's two elephants.

One of the Zoo's two elephants.

Now that the stadium land option is gone, the Zoo intends to hear additional options for expansion, which includes crossing the highway passing along its southern border.  The future of the Little Rock Zoo remains to be seen, however, as pressure from the state capitol is pushing to move the zoo outside of the city proper, and the mayor is considering cutting the budget by $2 million. 

Here is a very good article about the history of the zoo, and its potential future.

Its been touted as the “Eden Project” of wildlife. 

However, if you’ve been to the Eden Project, you’ll know this project seems to fall short.  Very short, in my opinion.  

Eden Project from above.  Reclamation of Clay Mine.

Eden Project from above. Reclamation of Clay Mine.

eden-3The Eden Project was, and is, as innovative in approach, as it was in design, made all that more impressive by the fact that botanical gardens and arboretia tend to be, well, on the more dull side.  The Eden Project, built in a reclaimed clay mine, brought hip to gardens; it connects the reality of being green to the flashy, trendy movement.  It creates a place to enjoy nature as an art, and art in nature, sometimes quite literally.  It’s also beautiful, fun, exciting, and a gorgeous piece of architecture and landscape architecture.

Walk at Eden Project

Walk at Eden Project

Bristol Zoo’s “Eco-Zoo”, which was conceived over 40 years ago and since shelved, claims to become “the first conservation-led animal visitor attraction of its kind in the UK.”  The $140 million Park is planned at 136 acres, and aims to be open by 2012, a lofty goal considering it hasn’t yet been approved.  The Park estimates attendance at 400,000 annually.  

Touting itself as the “next generation of zoological attractions”, I’m especially curious at what it aims to do differently.  The single article I could find about it outlines a few key points:

1.  “Bristol’s “eco zoo” could connect the inherent interest value of captive animals with the conservation methods needed to save their wild cousins.”

2. “The whole idea of captivity will be reduced to a minimum….The often controversially cramped spaces of the Victorian era’s most famous zoos are gone – replaced with open land, moats and ditches.”

3. “…most importantly, the four themed areas of the park…have all been chosen to reflect specific areas of the world where conservation is desperately needed to save critically endangered species. “

The Eco-Zoo's Sumatra Exhibit

The Eco-Zoo's Congo Exhibit

The Eco-Zoo's Sumatran Exhibit

The Eco-Zoo's Sumatran Exhibit

 So far, this sounds very similar to most zoos creating new exhibits across the U.S. and world.  Victorian era design died in the Victorian era, and as illustrated in a previous post, the idea of landscape immersion has been around since the 1970s.  Creating themed areas based on conservation needs is what is done with virtually every new exhibit out there.  What of all of the recent and upcoming Arctic exhibits?  Bronx Zoo’s Madagascar!? I’m duly unimpressed thus far…

The Eco-Zoo's British Woodland Exhibit
The Eco-Zoo’s British Woodland Exhibit
The Eco-Zoo's Indian Ocean Exhibit

The Eco-Zoo's Indian Ocean Exhibit

 

But then there’s this:

“Food for the animals will be organic, while 80 per cent of the building material will be locally sourced and sustainable. “

And this:

“Every aspect of the park’s design incorporates sustainability, from the buildings and the engineering infrastructure to the landscape.”

Now that’s new.  Seriously, folks.  Zoos tout themselves as conservation leaders, but are some of the most un-green institutions out there.  Tremendous amounts of water and electricity are wasted daily on washout of stalls and sustaining water life support systems in tanks and pools, amongst other things.  

Buildings themselves are most often behind the scenes and often suffer from the smallest budget.  For this reason, environmentally friendly alternative building practices rarely are integrated.   Recently, however, some zoos have been making an effort with their “non-animal” buildings, such as the LEED silver certified Nutrition Center at St. Louis Zoo.  

Silver Certified Nutrition Center at St. Louis Zoo

Silver Certified Nutrition Center at St. Louis Zoo

Speaking of the infamous LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Accreditation, no standards exist for buildings housing animals.  So, zoos and aquariums looking to do right by the environment through LEED (and gain a little good press and grant money, too), are oftentimes without means.   In the non-profit sector (as in many others), if you can’t gain revenue or attendance increases from something, it isn’t done.  And there goes the green leadership…

However, if this project can put their money where their mouth is (almost literally!), they may be onto something special.  If not for innovation in zoological exhibit design, then definitely for innovation in zoological construction and green design. 

I’ll be keeping my eyes peeled for more news about this potentially exciting project.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

Berlin Zoo’s megastar polar bear, Knut (the zoo’s equivalent of a studio produced boy band), turned two  on Friday, December 5.  However, the celebration was a quiet affair. 

Happy Birthday, Knut!

Happy Birthday, Knut!

News that the bear needs a larger enclosure as he reaches maturity has the bear’s biggest fans all atwitter.  Due to the omnipresent credit crunch, the Zoo’s intention to renovate the bear’s home have all but disappeared.  Instead, the Zoo is looking for potential new homes at European zoos far and wide.

baby-knut

Baby Knut

I’m impressed to hear the Zoo is willing to give up its 27% increase in attendance in exchange for “doing the right thing”–for the bear itself (to have a healthier and happier life), and for the species as a whole (to be given a chance to breed). 

Read the whole story here.  There’s a nice little video along with the article that I can’t seem to get into the post.  Check it out.

« Previous PageNext Page »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.